01 · AI development
In-product AI assistant on your own data
A retrieval assistant that answers from your help centre, PDFs, tickets, and policies — on the website, in the app, or on WhatsApp — with citations and a human fallback.
Support, operations, professional services, and any team that answers the same questions every day
This is the AI work CycloneWebz ships most often. It is not a generic chatbot widget dropped on a homepage. It is a retrieval assistant that can only speak from material you already own, placed in the channel your customers already use, with a person taking over when the system is unsure.
We write it as a capability study because the shape of the work repeats: the same ten questions burn staff time, a public model invents policy, after-hours enquiries die, and nobody can see what the bot said last Tuesday. The documents, the channel, and the brand voice change. The job does not.
What is going wrong
- ▸ Support and sales paste the same answers into chat, email, and WhatsApp every day.
- ▸ A theme chatbot or a vendor widget invents refund, pricing, or compliance answers.
- ▸ After-hours and weekend enquiries sit unanswered until Monday.
- ▸ Help-centre articles exist, but nobody searches them — they just open a ticket.
- ▸ There is no log of what the assistant said, so you cannot improve the corpus.
- ▸ The AI vendor is separate from the team that owns the website or the app.
What we build
A mapped question set, not a model looking for a job
We sit with support and ops and write down the ten to thirty questions that actually cost time. We match each one to the document, CMS page, or ticket thread that already answers it. If the answer is not written down, we say so before anyone talks about models.
Retrieval over your corpus
Help-centre articles, PDFs, FAQs, and approved ticket macros are chunked, stored, and retrieved. The assistant answers from those passages. It does not invent a policy that is not in the files. Citations are shown to the agent or, when you want, to the customer.
The assistant in the product
Web widget, in-app help, or WhatsApp — sometimes all three with one brain. Tone, language (English and Hindi when needed), and what the bot is allowed to do are set with you. Booking, order status, or ticket creation can be wired when the data is clean enough.
Handoff, logs, and a weekly loop
Low confidence, angry language, or a topic you marked as human-only opens a person. Every turn is logged. Each week we add missing documents, fix prompts, and retire answers that drifted. That loop is the product, not a one-off launch.
You leave with
- ▸ Question map and corpus inventory (what you have, what is missing)
- ▸ Retrieval pipeline over approved documents, with versioning
- ▸ Assistant UI on web, in-app, and/or WhatsApp
- ▸ Citation display and confidence-based human handoff
- ▸ Staff transcript console and export
- ▸ Eval set of real questions, scored before and after launch
- ▸ Topic block-list and brand-voice rules
- ▸ Runbook for adding documents and reviewing failed turns
This is for you if
- ▸ Support and sales teams drowning in repeat questions that already have written answers
- ▸ Service businesses that want WhatsApp or web help after hours without inventing policy
- ▸ Product teams adding a first AI feature to an existing site or app
- ▸ Operators who need a log of every answer for training and compliance
This is not for you if
- – A company that wants a public model trained on their private data with no retrieval and no review
- – A brief that is only “add ChatGPT to the site” with no documents and no owner
- – A use case that is really a full CRM rebuild dressed up as a chatbot